Total Pageviews

Saturday, July 12, 2014

Revisionist History? Truth Stranger Than Fiction? This article appeared last week in the NY Times

Takeover of Kenmore Hotel: Informer Recalls His Complicity

Inside
Photo
Earl Robert Merritt seen last week. He was an informer known as Tony when the government seized the Kenmore Hotel in 1994. Credit Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

The Truth

It was as if the Fifth Infantry Division had come marching down East 23rd Street.
Late in the morning of June 8, 1994, police officers, federal marshals and F.B.I. agents invaded one of New York City’s grand temples of dysfunction: the 22-story, 641-room ulcer known as the Kenmore Hotel.
They ran into the lobby, which stank of mildew and urine. They ran up the stairs, as crack vials crackled beneath their feet.
They battered down doors and rousted residents in that vast rabbit warren. They arrested 18 tenants on charges of drug dealing; the tenants sat, dazed, in handcuffs on the sidewalk.
The takeover of the Kenmore was at the time the largest federal forfeiture to fight drug dealing in American history.
“The Kenmore Hotel has been permeated by violence and become a virtual supermarket of crack cocaine,” Mary Jo White, then the United States attorney in Manhattan, told reporters. Gov. Mario M. Cuomo visited the scene and Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani held an all-points press conference.
Why not? It was liberation.
Photo
The hotel, a warren of 641 rooms on East 23rd Street in Manhattan, was notorious for drug dealing. Credit John Sotomayor/The New York Times
There is another, more unsettling version. Two police informers now claim that the conquest of the Kenmore was a dirty victory, another chapter in an era in which the police and prosecutors fought a blood tide of homicides, crack and heroin, and too often took disturbing liberties.
We love to congratulate ourselves on New York’s global reputation as a safe, even pasteurized metropolis. The informer’s tale suggests that the trail the city traveled had more disquieting byways than we realized.
A confidential informer, a man whose career in snitching for the police and federal agencies extends back to the Watergate era, said the assault on the Kenmore was constructed of illegalities. This informer, Earl Robert Merritt, described how he had worked with narcotics officers — before and after the takeover — to frame more than 150 Kenmore residents as dealers.
“I planted drugs, I planted guns, I made false reports,” Mr. Merritt said. “I was given a list — little stars by the list of tenants who I was supposed to set up.”
“I helped send hundreds of people out in handcuffs,” he added, “and I’d say 80 percent were innocent.”
Mr. Merritt, 70, who hobbles about with wrecked hips and two black canes, was an informer for nearly 40 years, according to federal and police records. The Manhattan district attorney confirmed that he had worked at the Kenmore; two officers said he was an excellent informer.
He named dozens of people he said he had set up. Some served prison terms, records show. After the takeover of the Kenmore, he said, he undermined its tenants’ association, again at the direction of federal agents.
Mr. Merritt took his accusations to the Manhattan district attorney last year. He said an assistant prosecutor in the mid-1990s had directed him to swear falsely that he had witnessed certain crimes.
A public-corruption prosecutor interviewed Mr. Merritt and pulled court files.
“Senior prosecutors have done extensive interviews with this informant, and followed several potential leads, but to date have not found provable allegations,” a law enforcement official familiar with Mr. Merritt’s allegations said. “But the file is open, and if more information comes to light it will certainly be taken seriously.”
The district attorney’s investigation appears to have been confined to pulling court files. In eight months of interviewing dozens of people connected with the Kenmore, including former tenants, those arrested and police officers, I did not find one who had been questioned anew.
Mr. Merritt’s charges can be difficult to verify. Many former Kenmore tenants — impoverished, haunted by addictions and bouncing along the river bottom of life — have disappeared from the public record. By his own account, those whom Mr. Merritt fingered as drug dealers and illegally set up ran the gamut, from actual dealers to low-level drug users with mental health issues to tenant leaders who angered him or federal and city agents but were not dealing drugs at all.
Five people — two former tenants, a caseworker, a former lawyer and another police informer — confirmed Mr. Merritt’s core accusations. Three of the five spoke on the record. “He’d tell us a tenant was going to be arrested and the next day, out they went, out in handcuffs,” the former caseworker said. “They wanted to clean the place out, and they gave him lists, and he’d be swearing to God people were drug dealers.”
I reached Dominick Crispino, the former lawyer and tenant — who has since been disbarred and done time for larceny. “We kept saying Merritt was a tool of the government and told the courts he was setting people up,” he said. “If he’s coming clean, you can count on every word. He was one of the smartest people I ever tangled with.”
A quick-witted fellow with owlish eyes, Mr. Merritt lived in an ethical netherworld. He was a crack addict, and in the 1980s had been convicted of felony fraud and became a fugitive. (A judge later tossed out the conviction.)
In long interviews at his apartment off Fordham Road in the Bronx, however, Mr. Merritt rarely contradicted himself. Court records confirmed his mastery of details. He insisted that I portray him as deeply flawed.
“You cannot paint me with a halo on my head,” he said. “I’m a nasty son of a bitch.”
Three law enforcement agents described Mr. Merritt as a cunning informer.
If there was a hero at the Kenmore Hotel, it was Scott Kimmins, a tall patrolman known to lawbreakers as Stretch. Before the federal takeover, he walked the hotel stairs alone. He rousted and arrested dealers and comforted marooned innocents.
He came to know Mr. Merritt, who accused him of no illegalities.
“He was on the money, for the most part,” noted Mr. Kimmins, now operations director for the Flatiron 23rd Street Business Improvement District. “He’d mention a room, and sure enough, you’d see drug activity.”
Mr. Kimmins emphasized that he did not know the narcotics officers or their relationship with Mr. Merritt. He saw no need for illegal subterfuges. “That’s ridiculous,” he said. “You could be deaf and dumb and make a bust there.”
He said Mr. Merritt loved to tell tall tales of his supposed connections to intelligence agencies and Watergate.
But as it happened, those tales were true.
Federal records confirm that Mr. Merritt worked with the Washington police and the F.B.I. to infiltrate left-wing groups in Washington in the early 1970s; that his police handler apprehended the Watergate burglars; and that he was interviewed by investigators for the Watergate special prosecutor, Archibald Cox.

Told of this, Mr. Kimmins chuckled ruefully. Years ago, he noted, he assumed the charges against the police officers accused of abusing Abner Louima were absurd. Those accusations, too, proved true. “I don’t believe Tony,” he said. “But I’ve been surprised before.”
Mr. Merritt offers his own caution: “A confidential informant is a very powerful character. We don’t need a badge or gun. And we ruin lives.”
Photo
Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani in 1996 unveiling plans for the restoration of the Kenmore Hotel two years after it was taken over. Credit Don Hogan Charles/The New York Times
THE KENMORE HOTEL had a seedy literary pedigree. It was a Gramercy Park refuge for Dashiell Hammett; Nathanael West worked as a night manager.
Its decline was baroque.
In 1985, Tran Dinh Truong, a shipping magnate who prospered mysteriously during the Vietnam War, arrived in the United States with suitcases full of gold bars. He bought the Kenmore as a tax shelter, and ran it with no regard for safety.
He filled the place with ex-convicts, prostitutes and addicts. He hired security guards who waved in anyone for a few dollars. Mr. Merritt, a moth to that flame, got a job.
“My main job was to hand out cash envelopes to the building and elevator inspectors,” Mr. Merritt said. “The only thing they inspected was their envelopes.”
Conditions inside grew hideous. An 86-year-old was murdered in the communal bathroom. A woman was strangled in her room.
For residents of Gramercy Park, an embattled middle-class pocket, the hotel visited miseries from burglaries to drug dealing.
By the early 1990s, federal officials had set their eyes on Mr. Truong and his wayward hotel. Narcotics officers and federal agents made more than 100 arrests and, records show, they relied on an informer: Mr. Merritt.
He is gifted at ingratiating himself. He could laugh with a dealer, buy vials of crack and smoke it. Then he would point out that man for the police. “If I didn’t like you, or the police wanted you gone, you were gone,” he said.
It was as if he was inhaling chutzpah. “It was too outrageous for even dealers to think he’d come right back the next day,” the former caseworker said.
Robert Chaney also worked there as a confidential informer. As pressure increased, narcotics officers plotted. “They would get really upset when they busted into a room and found nothing there,” he said. “They gave him drugs and maybe a gun and he’d plant it.”
Asked about this, Mr. Merritt nodded. “They would tell me which rooms to target, and I would slip crack behind a mattress or under the sink.”
Detectives taught him to set small fires, he said. Firefighters would batter down doors; the police would find crack and guns.
He got $50 per arrest, and $100 every time he testified to a judge.
Prosecutors guaranteed Mr. Merritt that he would not have to testify in public. They had suspects over a barrel: Serve six months in jail and leave the hotel — or we’ll imprison you for 20 years.
SEEN from the remove of a safer city, those dark years now reveal signs of a dirty war. Too often, swaggering detectives and prosecutors eager for any victory broke rules and framed people. And confidential informers were given enormous latitude to set up people.
Eugene O’Donnell, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, was a beat officer before he became a prosecutor. The occupational hazard in dealing with informers, he said, was that “your ears are open to what you want to hear.”
It was perilously easy, Mr. O’Donnell said, for an officer working with an informer to think nothing of setting up a hapless character with minor convictions.
“It dovetails with the problem of false convictions,” he said. “The real danger is that we get your rap sheet, and we see a track record of minor drug abuse, and no one loses sleep over your conviction. The ends justify the means.”
Mr. Merritt described being driven to the Manhattan district attorney’s office on a rainy evening. A prosecutor was typing statements for him, which he was going to swear to before a judge.
“Read this carefully and don’t stray from the statement,” the prosecutor told him, he said. “You’re going to have to swear to this. Do you have a problem, Tony?”
He said he looked at the prosecutor and asked: “So you want me to commit perjury?”
“I don’t want to hear that,” the prosecutor replied, according to Mr. Merritt.
After the takeover, Mr. Merritt said, federal marshals and the police told him to disrupt the tenants’ association. He and Mr. Chaney tore down notices and interrupted meetings and shrieked. An officer, he said, told him to vandalize Mr. Crispino’s car.
“He was very skilled and very scary; he could get you arrested in about five minutes,” said Sal Martinez, a tenant leader. “I complained and a federal agent yelled at me: ‘Merritt is working for us. Don’t get in our way.’ ”
There is no doubt the Kenmore is a safer, better-run place. Social services are provided; security is insistent. Maybe we’ll never know if more than 100 New Yorkers got walked out in cuffs and convicted on the basis of planted evidence and false testimony.

Or perhaps the ends justified the means, and it’s a door better left closed.
Except that similar raids occurred at other single-room-occupancy hotels throughout the city. Mr. Merritt worked as a confidential informer at a couple of those, too. This story, you see, may not end on East 23rd Street.
“This is not just a Kenmore story,” Mr. Merritt said. “This was happening everywhere.”
Email: powellm@nytimes.com
Twitter: @powellnyt
A version of this article appears in print on July 3, 2014, on page A19 of the New York edition with the headline: Takeover of Hotel: Informer Recalls His Complicity. ||

Kenmore Hall's Outstanding Violations

If you're interested in finding out more about existing violations in the building, follow the link below

Department of Housing and Preservation Portal

and then click on Complaint History in the left-hand sidebar.

Friday, July 4, 2014

Watch Your Back (Because Security Won't)!

Last month, one of our front desk workers was attacked by a tenant with a knife in the lobby. An eyewitness said that the tenant ran up behind the worker as she approached the lobby restroom, grabbed her by the hair, threatened to kill her, and managed to cut her on the face before being removed. The disturbed tenant claimed that the worker had been flirting with her man; the irony is that this took place a week or two before the worker's wedding date. After the attack, the tenant was taken away in an ambulance, presumably to a local psychiatric ward.

Well, the tenant was spotted in the building again this week. She's back, and we have no idea what frame of mind she's in now.

This attack just goes to show that nobody's really safe in the building, in spite of all the cameras - some of which have been installed this year. CAMERAS DON'T PREVENT ASSAULTS or other crimes. They only provide a record of something that's already happened - after the fact. It's a case of closing the barn door after the horse has run away. We have an alleged security director who is invisible most of the time, and nobody on staff who is licensed to actually provide security. When there are problems, we're all told to call 911, and the local police precinct seems amused by calls from Kenmore Hall.

My question is this: why are dangerous people allowed to return to this building after they've attacked people? Anywhere else, something like this could be legitimate grounds for an eviction proceeding. Management seems to cultivate more and more people like this. It's perverse, because they don't hold themselves accountable to anyone who gets attacked and they do nothing to prevent the attacks in the first place.

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS? RESPOND WITH A COMMENT.

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Fwd: Rent Guidelines Board Final Vote | Weekly Update



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Met Council Update <active@metcouncilonhousing.org>
Date: Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:45 PM
Subject: Rent Guidelines Board Final Vote | Weekly Update



In This Update: RGB: What's at Stake? 
RGB Hearings in Brooklyn and Queens
 | Know Your Rights: RGB Testimony



 
 

RENT GUIDELINES BOARD: WHAT'S AT STAKE?

Mayor de Blasio was swept into office because a "Tale of Two Cities" resonated with the vast majority of voters. In our humble opinion, the first step to building a city that works for all of us - regardless of socio-economic status - is to ensure that New Yorkers can afford to live in New York.

It appeared to members of the housing justice movement that Mayor de Blasio agreed. When running for office, he pledged to freeze rents. So the RGB vote has taken on a new significance - the RGB's decision will send a message about what sort of administration the new mayor will run.

Our executive director, Jaron Benjamin, wrote about what a rent freeze would mean for tenants in the NY Times' Room for Debate section, and pointed out how many low-income tenants are in danger of losing their homes and becoming homeless.


Keisha Jacobs, a leader with UHAB, talked to the New York Daily News about what a rent freeze would mean to her family. Read the story HERE.

After More than 200 tenants gathered outside of the first Rent Guidelines Board meeting this year, (read coverage in the NY Times and the Wall Street Journal), the Rent Guidelines Board met on May 5th to vote on rent adjustments for the approximately one million rent regulated apartments in NYC. Tenants collectively pushed for a rent rollback because a reduction in rent would drastically help NYC tenants. Any reasonable person can see that NYC tenants need a rent rollback (or a rent freeze at the very least). 

There were spikes in unaffordability for rent stabilized tenants during the Bloomberg Administration. For the last twelve years, landlord income has outpaced tenant's earnings. Since the recession began in 2008, landlords of rent stabilized apartments grew from $.35 on the dollar to $.40 on the dollar.
 
A rent freeze does not do enough to restore balance, which is why we called a rent rollback. But when the Rent Guidelines Board held their initial vote, the new board approved a range of increases from 0-3% for a one year lease renewal and 0.5-4.5% for a two year renewal. Despite our disappointment, we are cautiously optimistic that with more pressure and a continued presence, we can achieve a rent freeze.

Wasim Lone, a long time tenant organizer, held a sign designed to hold the new mayor accaountable for his campaign promise. Read coverage about Monday's hearing in the NY Daily News HERE
The new mayor's affordable housing plan relied heavily on the construction of new affordable housing. During the last decade, we lost far more affordable housing than we gained, and we can't build our way out of this crisis. We need an affordable housing agenda that focuses on the New Yorkers who were shut out of Bloomberg's plans. This agenda, in part, must include a rent freeze.

Tenants have showed up in droves and have outnumbered landlords all year long. We have to keep up the pressure. If you haven't been involved in this year's RGB hearings, now's the time to do it. If you've been at every RGB event, bring your friends.

Our actions will shape the future of the city, and will help determine who can live here. Rent regulated housing is the largest affordable housing program in the state, and the most important fight to protect it has begun.


WHAT: Rent Guidelines Board Final Vote
WHEN: Monday, June 23 at 6pm
WHERE: 7 East 7th Street, the Great Hall at Cooper Union


Please contact Joseph Loonam at joseph@metcouncilonhousing.org for more information, fliers, and organizing opportunities.


 


 

REMAINING RGB SCHEDULE 

The Rent Guidelines Board is holding hearings throughout New York City. Go to go to www.nycrgb.org/html/about/meetings.html or see the chart below to find out when and where.  

But most importantly, tenants need to turn out in great numbers and testify. This can seem daunting, but we've attached a short guide to testifying in the next section. This should help every rent stabilized tenant prepare to use their voice to speak out against unfair and unjust rent hikes.

 

Date

Location Time

Wednesday,
June 18, 2014
Public Testimony

Brooklyn Borough Hall
209 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201

5:00 - 8:00 P.M.

Thursday,
June 19, 2014
Public Testimony

Queens Borough Hall
120-55 Queens Boulevard
Kew Gardens, NY 11424

5:00 - 8:00 P.M.

Monday,
June 23, 2014
Final Vote

The Great Hall at Cooper Union
7 East 7th Street at corner of 3rd Ave. (Basement)
New York, NY 10003

6:00 P.M.


 



 

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: TESTIFY AT THE RGB

The Rent Guidelines Board will vote June 23 to set how much landlords can raise rents on rent-stabilized apartments for leases beginning on or after Oct. 1. On May 5, it recommended that this year's increases be between zero and 3 percent for one year and between 0.5 and 4.5 percent for two.

There are two public hearings left before the final vote, and the Rent Guidelines Board needs to hear from you. If you're a rent stabilized tenant living in either Queens or Brooklyn, 

We believe that a rent freeze—or better, a rent rollback—is justified because of the high increases the RGB has granted over the last several years. Here are some points to make while testifying at the public hearings:

  • Talk about the economic hardships you're facing. Do you live on a fixed income? Have you lost your job? Are you are supporting your children or other members of your household? Are you are working two or more jobs in order to make ends meet?
  • The RGB should consider the incredible hardship that any increase at all will cause to many low- and moderate-income tenants, whose incomes have not kept up with the cost of living—and especially with rising rents. For example, the smallest rent increase the board has ever voted, 2 percent for one year and 4 percent for two, is twice as much as the raise city teachers and transit workers just got.
  • Landlords don't deserve more rent, and should bear their fair share of the economic burden in this city because their profits are increasing, even since the recession began.
  • If you have received an MCI increase over the past 10 years or so, talk about how your rent has increased more than the RGB guidelines. For example, if you received an MCI last year and signed a two-year lease, your rent would have increased by 13.75 percent—the RGB guideline of 7.75 percent and the 6 percent allowed for MCIs. Talk about how these permanent rent increases affect your ability to pay your rent.
  • If you moved into your apartment less than a few years ago, did your landlord claim a vacancy increase or an Individual Apartment Improvement increase before you moved in? That means they've raised your rent by far more than the RGB guidelines would normally allow.
  • Compare the increases your landlord has received to the increases you have received in income. How much was your rent ten years ago, and how much is it now? How much was your income ten years ago, and how much is it now? For example, say "In 2004, my rent was ___, now it is ____. In 2004, my income was ___, now its ___."
  • If you are now spending more than 30 percent of your income on rent, that is more than what the federal government defines as a hardship for tenants. Make sure you include that fact in your testimony. Today, half of rent-stabilized tenants are paying more than about 35 percent of their income in rent. Almost 1/3 are paying more than half of theirs.
  • If you know for sure that your building's owner is a predatory-equity landlord who has overpaid for your building and is actively seeking to drive tenants out and raise rents high enough to get the apartments deregulated, include this in your testimony.

For more information or to sign up to testify, go to www.nycrgb.org/html/about/meetings.html, or contact us at joseph@metcouncilonhousing.org.


 


 

MET COUNCIL IN THE NEWS

**Please note that the Met Council on Housing is not and has never been affiliated with the Met Council on Jewish Poverty in any way** 

The Met Council on Housing is dedicated to fighting for safe, stable, affordable housing for more than 50 years.
Visit us on the web at www.metcouncilonhousing.org


Click here to stop receiving our emails.

339 Lafayette Street #301
New York, NY 10012
United States

 




--
"Never underestimate the power of a small, dedicated group of people to change the world; indeed, that is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

Sunday, June 15, 2014

We've had some interesting things posted on the building's bulletin boards recently. One is potentially misleading, and the other is an interesting commentary on building security policies. Let's start with misleading:

This could ONLY be of value to tenants who have children under the age of 18. THIS IS NOT AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR FREE LUNCH FOR ADULTS! Nobody in this building is eligible for this lunch program - so I'm wondering what motivated staff to post it in the first place? I've had several tenants ask me about this sign in the last day. (By the way, I'm willing to bet that anyone in the building who's reasonably actively involved in parenting their kids already knew about this program - I've known about it for years; my son is in high school.)

And on to the next one:

Hmmm. Let's see now. This one isn't signed, which makes me wonder, has Ralph Garcia gotten so lazy that he's just phoning stuff in now? He probably called the front desk and told one of the workers to type this one up for him. Whatever. It's another case of too little, too late. We've seen memos like this before; people have been tossing crap out the windows for the past 5 years, probably longer. Hania Schwartz sent one of this around back in 2009; Dan Danaher notoriously had one of these parked on every tenant's door one day in 2010, and that one threatened legal action and police involvement. Tenants throw crap out the windows on the airshaft side of the building almost every night; you can't see it, but you can HEAR it clattering all the way down. It's a miracle that the skylights over the first floor haven't been totally destroyed yet. About six months ago someone was throwing wads of newspaper covered in feces out the windows over 23rd Street (how revolting). So my point is this, for starters: does staff really, honestly believe that posting memos makes this kind of behavior stop? If so, they may need check ups from the neck up. Please. This is just another example of what happens when you have a building with the (I'm trying to be polite) "diverse" population we do, and little or no regulation of the extreme cases. I know, I know, "everybody deserves a home", including drug addicts, drunks and mental cases, but when you decide to incorporate the level of "diversity" that we have here and NOT MONITOR the extreme cases, this is what happens. We have one tenant who regularly sleeps in the lobby, bragging that he gets the best sleep there because he feels "like a rat in a hole" up in his room. He's STILL occupying the lobby nearly every day despite being hauled off for evaluation not long ago (probably because he knows how to work the system and come off humble, meek and respectful in front of a psychiatrist when he knows he could get locked up in a psych ward for a long period of observation for letting loose with his usual angry, hate-filled monologues).

Security policies in the building don't regulate the people who really NEED regulating. All of us get punished for the outrageous behavior of a few; we no longer have full access to our own lobby and community room because a curfew was imposed after some tenants had altercations there. It wouldn't occur to security to ban the problem tenants and let the others continue using the space appropriately, quietly and peacefully. Our rights are being chipped away because we have to "tolerate" those who don't know how to live normally. A member of our front desk staff was recently attacked by a tenant who apparently had a long standing grudge against her; it happened at night when Mr. Garcia wasn't on premises, but I wonder what his response would have been even if he HAD been here. The front desk area wasn't always covered in plexiglass, protecting staff from tenants - which means that conditions are getting worse in the building. This, by the way, is in spite of the addition of more surveillance cameras.

If you want to read a longer, more detailed discussion about the lack of real security in the building, scroll down and find the post from February 15th of this year. And keep in mind that the stock answer you'll get from most staff members here is that tenants should call 911 if there is an emergency or problem. WHY DO WE HAVE A SECURITY DIRECTOR ON PREMISES if that is the standard way of dealing with an emergency?

What do YOU think about this? Again, please feel free to post comments - they can be anonymous.

Monday, June 9, 2014

Fwd: DEADLINE EXTENDED: FAC Advance Affordable Housing Advertisement

From: Fifth Avenue Committee <facleasing@fifthave.org>
Date: Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:57 PM
Subject: DEADLINE EXTENDED: FAC Advance Affordable Housing Advertisement



Having trouble viewing this email? Click here

Fifth Avenue Committee's 
Renovated Apartments for Rent
DEADLINE EXTENDED TO:
JUNE 13



For details on the program and apartments, please refer to the earlier post on this blog






IT'S ABOUT TIME!

Just after 4 p.m. this afternoon, a Beth Israel ambulance and a police car were idling in front of the building, and Molly Mattimore, Francesca Rossi, Kristi Kimmerle and Dan Danaher were seen hanging out nearby. They seemed to be waiting for something, or someone...

After about 15 minutes, several E.M.S. workers and two police officers went into the building accompanied by Ms. Rossi. Butch was seated in the lobby in his usual spot, and the police officers approached him and started talking. Apparently they were there, with the E.M.S. staff, to take him to the hospital to have a medical evaluation. He wasn't much interested in the idea, and claimed he sees a doctor here on Thursdays, and stated that he doesn't trust doctors. The officers asked him whether he had anything dangerous on his person, and he said he had a cellphone. They asked again and clarified, explaining that they were interested in weapons. Long story short, he wasn't technically being arrested, but the evaluation wasn't an optional "suggestion", either.

It wasn't pleasant watching a neighbor being hauled off to the hospital that way, but his behavior in public has been extremely unpleasant for a very long time. It's one thing to be drunk, loud, repetitive and hopelessly boring on a regular basis - but quite another thing to repeatedly rant and rave about how depressed he is, get up in peoples' faces, gesturing wildly, yelling at the top of his lungs, practically ordering other tenants to get out of his way and leave him alone just because they also have the misfortune of being near him while he's occupying the lobby (most of the time, they were already sitting there when he walked in) - and then threaten to stab people in the heart. Most of his ranting and raving is about how much he hates other people, and is quite racist and bigoted. He's also threatened to attack a certain tenant's son. For the past few months, he's been looking so out of control that a number of people have wondered how long it would be before he actually snapped and got physical with people. He flipped out after a community meeting several months ago after several tenants brought up the fact that it would be nice not to have the curfews applied to the community room and lobby any more, and one tenant pointed out that one of the problems with the curfew is that it's a response to folks like Butch getting into altercations and sleeping in both areas.

Our Security Director's response to violent activity in the building is usually to tell people to call 911. We have surveillance cameras all over the building monitoring what tenants are doing - and several have been added in the last year. The lobby and community room have had curfews applied in response to altercations between a few tenants; the curfew affects the entire building. Management has no problem banning tenants it doesn't like from using the computer room or going on movie trips because those are "privileges" rather than "rights". I'd love to understand the logic behind allowing violent, chemically dependent tenants to carry on in threatening, disturbing ways in common areas of the building for prolonged periods of time without banning them because they're creating a nuisance AND potentially unsafe conditions in common areas. The rest of us who pay rent (which covers use of both the lobby and community room) and DON'T create a disturbance when we use those areas are being punished twice - first when we have to put up with people like Butch, and then again when our rights are restricted by Security.  Cameras don't prevent problems or crimes. Follow up by live humans who are willing to be accountable for the job they're being paid to do would make more sense. Ralph Garcia makes a lot of rules, but the rules are illogical and don't make the building any safer for the majority of the tenants.  If you want more details on what I think about security inside of Kenmore Hall, look at the material I posted on February 15th, which is salvaged from my first tenant blog. Take a look at the post from January 17 for more commentary on use of the lobby and community room.

By the way, H.S.I.'s version of "supportive housing" doesn't help people like Butch out at all; he's one of their most perfect candidates for "help" because he fits the profile that HUD and various supportive housing networks and advocates have been pushing over the past few years. He was homeless for over 20 years (if that isn't a definition of chronically homeless, I don't know what IS) and he's clearly alcoholic - he stinks like a brewery most days, and the drunker he gets, the meaner he is. Drinking affects his personality. See the video clip in the sidebar to the right for a very brief example. Although H.S.I. claims that Kenmore Hall is a permanent supportive housing facility, they have a track record of completely ignoring some of their more extreme tenant-clients for long periods of time, letting them run amok while they interfere with their neighbors. These tenants are struggling with a cluster of problems and issues that need to be dealt with, and which H.S.I. is supposed to be receiving government funding to address - but they're totally dropping the ball. Part of what supportive housing is supposed to accomplish is assisting people like Butch become more self-sufficient and independent, able to function more normally and maintain their income and housing so they don't become homeless again. H.S.I. claims to be able to deliver this type of program more efficiently and cheaply than many other alternatives. Where's the proof?

I'd love to hear what others think about this. Feel free to comment.

Butch was back in the lobby by midnight, sitting in his usual chair. I guess the hospital didn't keep him for observation or treatment. Or maybe he just walked out on his own.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

The Hot Water Saga Concludes

I stopped by the front desk around 5 on Saturday afternoon and asked the staff there (VERY politely, by the way, because I assumed they'd been asked that very question many many times already) when they thought the hot water would be back on, and was told (very nonchalantly) that someone was working on the boiler and that the hot water would be back on sometime Sunday or Monday. The fellow telling me this couldn't even be bothered to turn around completely to face me while speaking as he leaned back casually in his chair. Hello? MONDAY? Really? And this is the freakin' boiler they were working on for most of a week just a couple of months ago to ensure that we had better water pressure and more hot water? I (again, very politely, and without raising my voice) asked if he realized that it's ridiculous to have the hot water out for that long in a residential building, and probably worth a call to 311 to report a violation, and he copped an attitude. It's so much fun dealing with the new front desk staff; they haven't been here all that long, they're very young, and they can't seem to wipe the smug disdain off their faces while they're talking to tenants - they're just plain RUDE most of the time. I realize that they don't have to give a damn, and that they simply don't, but someone early on forgot to teach them the basic manners the rest of us were taught as a matter of course. The older staff, who have been here for quite a while have a totally different attitude. It's called respect.

Interestingly enough, when I got back, not only was the hot water back on, but another tenant told me that they'd actually found a practical use for that computer they've got in their plexiglass cage - a sign had been put up explaining the progress with the repair. Which, by the way, could have been done HOURS EARLIER that day, saving a lot of hassle for tenants who already have lowered expectations about the building's maintenance, because if it's not one thing, it's another - usually two broken elevators at a time for over a week.

Saturday, June 7, 2014

Business as usual...

So. We've had no hot water in the building for hours, and the front desk says that someone is working on the boiler right now. Meanwhile, when I was in the lobby a few minutes ago, two of our maintenance staff members were overheard asking each other which one of them was supposed to be working on the boiler. Do you think it's time to phone 311 and let them know that we don't have hot water?


Friday, June 6, 2014

Invitation: You're Invited to a Discussion on Affordable Housing @ Tue Jun 24, 2014 8am - 11am (Kenmore Hall Tenants Association)

You're Invited to a Discussion on Affordable Housing

The Care for the Homeless Policy Committee is sponsoring a presentation and discussion on New York City's new Affordable Housing Plan and Homelessness in New York City. The free program led by Policy Committee Chair Barbara Knecht, Policy Director Jeff Foreman and Care for the Homeless client leaders is open to the public but requires reservation by advance RSVP.

The program will be held at 8:15 a.m. on Tuesday, June 24th, at the CFH Conference room on the 5th floor at 30 E. 33rd Street in Manhattan, and will be repeated at the same location and time on Thursday, June 26. Advance reservations (subject to space limitations) are available by contacting policy@cfhnyc.org.

Download the printable version of this month's Policy Matters newsletter here.
When
Tue Jun 24, 2014 8am – 11am Eastern Time
Where
CFH Conference room on the 5th floor at 30 E. 33rd Street in Manhattan (map)
Calendar
Kenmore Hall Tenants Association
Who
Emily Brown - creator
emilyholiday.khta@blogger.com
Kenmore Hall Tenants Association

Going?    - -     

Invitation from Google Calendar

You are receiving this courtesy email at the account emilyholiday.khta@blogger.com because you are an attendee of this event.

To stop receiving future notifications for this event, decline this event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at https://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification settings for your entire calendar.

You're Invited to a Discussion on Affordable Housing

The Care for the Homeless Policy Committee is sponsoring a presentation and discussion on New York City's new Affordable Housing Plan and Homelessness in New York City. The free program led by Policy Committee Chair Barbara Knecht, Policy Director Jeff Foreman and Care for the Homeless client leaders is open to the public but requires reservation by advance RSVP

The program will be held at 8:15 a.m. on Tuesday, June 24th, at the CFH Conference room on the 5th floor at 30 E. 33rd Street in Manhattan, and will be repeated at the same location and time on Thursday, June 26. Advance reservations (subject to space limitations) are available by contacting policy@cfhnyc.org.   
 Download the printable version of this month's Policy Matters newsletter here.

Saturday, May 31, 2014

IF YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT MOVING OUT...

There's the potential for living DECENTLY in newly renovated housing, if you're willing to consider Brooklyn.

Fifth Avenue Committee's 
Renovated Apartments for Rent

FAC Advance HDFC is pleased to announce that applications are now being accepted for 8 affordable housing rental apartments now under construction at:

31 St. Mark's Place    Brooklyn, NY 11217 -   Park Slope Neighborhood
237 5th Avenue           Brooklyn, NY 11215 -   Park Slope Neighborhood
258 51st Street            Brooklyn, NY 11220 -   Sunset Park Neighborhood

These buildings are being renovated through the Third Party Transfer Program (TPT) of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development. The size, rent and targeted income distribution for the 8 apartments are as follows:


# Apts.
Available
Apartment
Size
Household
Size*
Monthly
Rent**
Total Annual
Minimum Income
Total Annual
Maximum Income***
11 Bedroom1$986$35,520$70,560
2$986$35,520$80,640
51 Bedrooms1$1,268$45,189$70,560
2$1,268$45,189$80,640
22 Bedrooms2$1,700$60,069$80,640
3$1,700$60,069$90,720
4$1,700$60,069$100,680
* Subject to occupancy criteria                            ** Includes gas for cooking                
*** Income guidelines subject to change


Qualified applicants will be required to meet income guidelines and additional selection criteria. Households may elect to submit an application by one of two methods: EITHER online OR by mail. To submit your application online now, please visit NYC Housing Connect at www.nyc.gov/housingconnect and select "Apply for Housing." All online applications must be submitted by June 10, 2014

To request an application by mail, please mail a self-addressed envelope to: Fifth Avenue Committee., 621 Degraw Street, Brooklyn, NY 11217.  All mailed applications must be returned by regular mail only (no priority, certified, registered, express, overnight or oversized mail will be accepted) to a post office box number that will be listed on the application, and must be postmarked by June 10, 2014.  

Applications will be selected by lottery; applicants who submit more than one application to this development will be disqualified.  Disqualified applications will not be accepted.  A general preference will be given to New York City residents.  Eligible households that include persons with mobility impairments will receive preference for 5% of the units; eligible households that include persons with visual and/or hearing impairments will receive preference for 2% of the units.  Current and eligible residents of Brooklyn Community Boards 2, 6 and 7 will receive preference for 50% of the units.  Eligible City of New York Municipal Employees will receive preference for 5% of the units.

No Broker's Fee. No Application Fee.
                  
  Bill De Blasio, Mayor
Vicki Been, Commissioner - NYCHPD

  RHH ribbon logos