Total Pageviews

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Fwd: Rent Guidelines Board Final Vote | Weekly Update



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Met Council Update <active@metcouncilonhousing.org>
Date: Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:45 PM
Subject: Rent Guidelines Board Final Vote | Weekly Update



In This Update: RGB: What's at Stake? 
RGB Hearings in Brooklyn and Queens
 | Know Your Rights: RGB Testimony



 
 

RENT GUIDELINES BOARD: WHAT'S AT STAKE?

Mayor de Blasio was swept into office because a "Tale of Two Cities" resonated with the vast majority of voters. In our humble opinion, the first step to building a city that works for all of us - regardless of socio-economic status - is to ensure that New Yorkers can afford to live in New York.

It appeared to members of the housing justice movement that Mayor de Blasio agreed. When running for office, he pledged to freeze rents. So the RGB vote has taken on a new significance - the RGB's decision will send a message about what sort of administration the new mayor will run.

Our executive director, Jaron Benjamin, wrote about what a rent freeze would mean for tenants in the NY Times' Room for Debate section, and pointed out how many low-income tenants are in danger of losing their homes and becoming homeless.


Keisha Jacobs, a leader with UHAB, talked to the New York Daily News about what a rent freeze would mean to her family. Read the story HERE.

After More than 200 tenants gathered outside of the first Rent Guidelines Board meeting this year, (read coverage in the NY Times and the Wall Street Journal), the Rent Guidelines Board met on May 5th to vote on rent adjustments for the approximately one million rent regulated apartments in NYC. Tenants collectively pushed for a rent rollback because a reduction in rent would drastically help NYC tenants. Any reasonable person can see that NYC tenants need a rent rollback (or a rent freeze at the very least). 

There were spikes in unaffordability for rent stabilized tenants during the Bloomberg Administration. For the last twelve years, landlord income has outpaced tenant's earnings. Since the recession began in 2008, landlords of rent stabilized apartments grew from $.35 on the dollar to $.40 on the dollar.
 
A rent freeze does not do enough to restore balance, which is why we called a rent rollback. But when the Rent Guidelines Board held their initial vote, the new board approved a range of increases from 0-3% for a one year lease renewal and 0.5-4.5% for a two year renewal. Despite our disappointment, we are cautiously optimistic that with more pressure and a continued presence, we can achieve a rent freeze.

Wasim Lone, a long time tenant organizer, held a sign designed to hold the new mayor accaountable for his campaign promise. Read coverage about Monday's hearing in the NY Daily News HERE
The new mayor's affordable housing plan relied heavily on the construction of new affordable housing. During the last decade, we lost far more affordable housing than we gained, and we can't build our way out of this crisis. We need an affordable housing agenda that focuses on the New Yorkers who were shut out of Bloomberg's plans. This agenda, in part, must include a rent freeze.

Tenants have showed up in droves and have outnumbered landlords all year long. We have to keep up the pressure. If you haven't been involved in this year's RGB hearings, now's the time to do it. If you've been at every RGB event, bring your friends.

Our actions will shape the future of the city, and will help determine who can live here. Rent regulated housing is the largest affordable housing program in the state, and the most important fight to protect it has begun.


WHAT: Rent Guidelines Board Final Vote
WHEN: Monday, June 23 at 6pm
WHERE: 7 East 7th Street, the Great Hall at Cooper Union


Please contact Joseph Loonam at joseph@metcouncilonhousing.org for more information, fliers, and organizing opportunities.


 


 

REMAINING RGB SCHEDULE 

The Rent Guidelines Board is holding hearings throughout New York City. Go to go to www.nycrgb.org/html/about/meetings.html or see the chart below to find out when and where.  

But most importantly, tenants need to turn out in great numbers and testify. This can seem daunting, but we've attached a short guide to testifying in the next section. This should help every rent stabilized tenant prepare to use their voice to speak out against unfair and unjust rent hikes.

 

Date

Location Time

Wednesday,
June 18, 2014
Public Testimony

Brooklyn Borough Hall
209 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201

5:00 - 8:00 P.M.

Thursday,
June 19, 2014
Public Testimony

Queens Borough Hall
120-55 Queens Boulevard
Kew Gardens, NY 11424

5:00 - 8:00 P.M.

Monday,
June 23, 2014
Final Vote

The Great Hall at Cooper Union
7 East 7th Street at corner of 3rd Ave. (Basement)
New York, NY 10003

6:00 P.M.


 



 

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: TESTIFY AT THE RGB

The Rent Guidelines Board will vote June 23 to set how much landlords can raise rents on rent-stabilized apartments for leases beginning on or after Oct. 1. On May 5, it recommended that this year's increases be between zero and 3 percent for one year and between 0.5 and 4.5 percent for two.

There are two public hearings left before the final vote, and the Rent Guidelines Board needs to hear from you. If you're a rent stabilized tenant living in either Queens or Brooklyn, 

We believe that a rent freeze—or better, a rent rollback—is justified because of the high increases the RGB has granted over the last several years. Here are some points to make while testifying at the public hearings:

  • Talk about the economic hardships you're facing. Do you live on a fixed income? Have you lost your job? Are you are supporting your children or other members of your household? Are you are working two or more jobs in order to make ends meet?
  • The RGB should consider the incredible hardship that any increase at all will cause to many low- and moderate-income tenants, whose incomes have not kept up with the cost of living—and especially with rising rents. For example, the smallest rent increase the board has ever voted, 2 percent for one year and 4 percent for two, is twice as much as the raise city teachers and transit workers just got.
  • Landlords don't deserve more rent, and should bear their fair share of the economic burden in this city because their profits are increasing, even since the recession began.
  • If you have received an MCI increase over the past 10 years or so, talk about how your rent has increased more than the RGB guidelines. For example, if you received an MCI last year and signed a two-year lease, your rent would have increased by 13.75 percent—the RGB guideline of 7.75 percent and the 6 percent allowed for MCIs. Talk about how these permanent rent increases affect your ability to pay your rent.
  • If you moved into your apartment less than a few years ago, did your landlord claim a vacancy increase or an Individual Apartment Improvement increase before you moved in? That means they've raised your rent by far more than the RGB guidelines would normally allow.
  • Compare the increases your landlord has received to the increases you have received in income. How much was your rent ten years ago, and how much is it now? How much was your income ten years ago, and how much is it now? For example, say "In 2004, my rent was ___, now it is ____. In 2004, my income was ___, now its ___."
  • If you are now spending more than 30 percent of your income on rent, that is more than what the federal government defines as a hardship for tenants. Make sure you include that fact in your testimony. Today, half of rent-stabilized tenants are paying more than about 35 percent of their income in rent. Almost 1/3 are paying more than half of theirs.
  • If you know for sure that your building's owner is a predatory-equity landlord who has overpaid for your building and is actively seeking to drive tenants out and raise rents high enough to get the apartments deregulated, include this in your testimony.

For more information or to sign up to testify, go to www.nycrgb.org/html/about/meetings.html, or contact us at joseph@metcouncilonhousing.org.


 


 

MET COUNCIL IN THE NEWS

**Please note that the Met Council on Housing is not and has never been affiliated with the Met Council on Jewish Poverty in any way** 

The Met Council on Housing is dedicated to fighting for safe, stable, affordable housing for more than 50 years.
Visit us on the web at www.metcouncilonhousing.org


Click here to stop receiving our emails.

339 Lafayette Street #301
New York, NY 10012
United States

 




--
"Never underestimate the power of a small, dedicated group of people to change the world; indeed, that is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

Sunday, June 15, 2014

We've had some interesting things posted on the building's bulletin boards recently. One is potentially misleading, and the other is an interesting commentary on building security policies. Let's start with misleading:

This could ONLY be of value to tenants who have children under the age of 18. THIS IS NOT AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR FREE LUNCH FOR ADULTS! Nobody in this building is eligible for this lunch program - so I'm wondering what motivated staff to post it in the first place? I've had several tenants ask me about this sign in the last day. (By the way, I'm willing to bet that anyone in the building who's reasonably actively involved in parenting their kids already knew about this program - I've known about it for years; my son is in high school.)

And on to the next one:

Hmmm. Let's see now. This one isn't signed, which makes me wonder, has Ralph Garcia gotten so lazy that he's just phoning stuff in now? He probably called the front desk and told one of the workers to type this one up for him. Whatever. It's another case of too little, too late. We've seen memos like this before; people have been tossing crap out the windows for the past 5 years, probably longer. Hania Schwartz sent one of this around back in 2009; Dan Danaher notoriously had one of these parked on every tenant's door one day in 2010, and that one threatened legal action and police involvement. Tenants throw crap out the windows on the airshaft side of the building almost every night; you can't see it, but you can HEAR it clattering all the way down. It's a miracle that the skylights over the first floor haven't been totally destroyed yet. About six months ago someone was throwing wads of newspaper covered in feces out the windows over 23rd Street (how revolting). So my point is this, for starters: does staff really, honestly believe that posting memos makes this kind of behavior stop? If so, they may need check ups from the neck up. Please. This is just another example of what happens when you have a building with the (I'm trying to be polite) "diverse" population we do, and little or no regulation of the extreme cases. I know, I know, "everybody deserves a home", including drug addicts, drunks and mental cases, but when you decide to incorporate the level of "diversity" that we have here and NOT MONITOR the extreme cases, this is what happens. We have one tenant who regularly sleeps in the lobby, bragging that he gets the best sleep there because he feels "like a rat in a hole" up in his room. He's STILL occupying the lobby nearly every day despite being hauled off for evaluation not long ago (probably because he knows how to work the system and come off humble, meek and respectful in front of a psychiatrist when he knows he could get locked up in a psych ward for a long period of observation for letting loose with his usual angry, hate-filled monologues).

Security policies in the building don't regulate the people who really NEED regulating. All of us get punished for the outrageous behavior of a few; we no longer have full access to our own lobby and community room because a curfew was imposed after some tenants had altercations there. It wouldn't occur to security to ban the problem tenants and let the others continue using the space appropriately, quietly and peacefully. Our rights are being chipped away because we have to "tolerate" those who don't know how to live normally. A member of our front desk staff was recently attacked by a tenant who apparently had a long standing grudge against her; it happened at night when Mr. Garcia wasn't on premises, but I wonder what his response would have been even if he HAD been here. The front desk area wasn't always covered in plexiglass, protecting staff from tenants - which means that conditions are getting worse in the building. This, by the way, is in spite of the addition of more surveillance cameras.

If you want to read a longer, more detailed discussion about the lack of real security in the building, scroll down and find the post from February 15th of this year. And keep in mind that the stock answer you'll get from most staff members here is that tenants should call 911 if there is an emergency or problem. WHY DO WE HAVE A SECURITY DIRECTOR ON PREMISES if that is the standard way of dealing with an emergency?

What do YOU think about this? Again, please feel free to post comments - they can be anonymous.

Monday, June 9, 2014

Fwd: DEADLINE EXTENDED: FAC Advance Affordable Housing Advertisement

From: Fifth Avenue Committee <facleasing@fifthave.org>
Date: Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:57 PM
Subject: DEADLINE EXTENDED: FAC Advance Affordable Housing Advertisement



Having trouble viewing this email? Click here

Fifth Avenue Committee's 
Renovated Apartments for Rent
DEADLINE EXTENDED TO:
JUNE 13



For details on the program and apartments, please refer to the earlier post on this blog






IT'S ABOUT TIME!

Just after 4 p.m. this afternoon, a Beth Israel ambulance and a police car were idling in front of the building, and Molly Mattimore, Francesca Rossi, Kristi Kimmerle and Dan Danaher were seen hanging out nearby. They seemed to be waiting for something, or someone...

After about 15 minutes, several E.M.S. workers and two police officers went into the building accompanied by Ms. Rossi. Butch was seated in the lobby in his usual spot, and the police officers approached him and started talking. Apparently they were there, with the E.M.S. staff, to take him to the hospital to have a medical evaluation. He wasn't much interested in the idea, and claimed he sees a doctor here on Thursdays, and stated that he doesn't trust doctors. The officers asked him whether he had anything dangerous on his person, and he said he had a cellphone. They asked again and clarified, explaining that they were interested in weapons. Long story short, he wasn't technically being arrested, but the evaluation wasn't an optional "suggestion", either.

It wasn't pleasant watching a neighbor being hauled off to the hospital that way, but his behavior in public has been extremely unpleasant for a very long time. It's one thing to be drunk, loud, repetitive and hopelessly boring on a regular basis - but quite another thing to repeatedly rant and rave about how depressed he is, get up in peoples' faces, gesturing wildly, yelling at the top of his lungs, practically ordering other tenants to get out of his way and leave him alone just because they also have the misfortune of being near him while he's occupying the lobby (most of the time, they were already sitting there when he walked in) - and then threaten to stab people in the heart. Most of his ranting and raving is about how much he hates other people, and is quite racist and bigoted. He's also threatened to attack a certain tenant's son. For the past few months, he's been looking so out of control that a number of people have wondered how long it would be before he actually snapped and got physical with people. He flipped out after a community meeting several months ago after several tenants brought up the fact that it would be nice not to have the curfews applied to the community room and lobby any more, and one tenant pointed out that one of the problems with the curfew is that it's a response to folks like Butch getting into altercations and sleeping in both areas.

Our Security Director's response to violent activity in the building is usually to tell people to call 911. We have surveillance cameras all over the building monitoring what tenants are doing - and several have been added in the last year. The lobby and community room have had curfews applied in response to altercations between a few tenants; the curfew affects the entire building. Management has no problem banning tenants it doesn't like from using the computer room or going on movie trips because those are "privileges" rather than "rights". I'd love to understand the logic behind allowing violent, chemically dependent tenants to carry on in threatening, disturbing ways in common areas of the building for prolonged periods of time without banning them because they're creating a nuisance AND potentially unsafe conditions in common areas. The rest of us who pay rent (which covers use of both the lobby and community room) and DON'T create a disturbance when we use those areas are being punished twice - first when we have to put up with people like Butch, and then again when our rights are restricted by Security.  Cameras don't prevent problems or crimes. Follow up by live humans who are willing to be accountable for the job they're being paid to do would make more sense. Ralph Garcia makes a lot of rules, but the rules are illogical and don't make the building any safer for the majority of the tenants.  If you want more details on what I think about security inside of Kenmore Hall, look at the material I posted on February 15th, which is salvaged from my first tenant blog. Take a look at the post from January 17 for more commentary on use of the lobby and community room.

By the way, H.S.I.'s version of "supportive housing" doesn't help people like Butch out at all; he's one of their most perfect candidates for "help" because he fits the profile that HUD and various supportive housing networks and advocates have been pushing over the past few years. He was homeless for over 20 years (if that isn't a definition of chronically homeless, I don't know what IS) and he's clearly alcoholic - he stinks like a brewery most days, and the drunker he gets, the meaner he is. Drinking affects his personality. See the video clip in the sidebar to the right for a very brief example. Although H.S.I. claims that Kenmore Hall is a permanent supportive housing facility, they have a track record of completely ignoring some of their more extreme tenant-clients for long periods of time, letting them run amok while they interfere with their neighbors. These tenants are struggling with a cluster of problems and issues that need to be dealt with, and which H.S.I. is supposed to be receiving government funding to address - but they're totally dropping the ball. Part of what supportive housing is supposed to accomplish is assisting people like Butch become more self-sufficient and independent, able to function more normally and maintain their income and housing so they don't become homeless again. H.S.I. claims to be able to deliver this type of program more efficiently and cheaply than many other alternatives. Where's the proof?

I'd love to hear what others think about this. Feel free to comment.

Butch was back in the lobby by midnight, sitting in his usual chair. I guess the hospital didn't keep him for observation or treatment. Or maybe he just walked out on his own.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

The Hot Water Saga Concludes

I stopped by the front desk around 5 on Saturday afternoon and asked the staff there (VERY politely, by the way, because I assumed they'd been asked that very question many many times already) when they thought the hot water would be back on, and was told (very nonchalantly) that someone was working on the boiler and that the hot water would be back on sometime Sunday or Monday. The fellow telling me this couldn't even be bothered to turn around completely to face me while speaking as he leaned back casually in his chair. Hello? MONDAY? Really? And this is the freakin' boiler they were working on for most of a week just a couple of months ago to ensure that we had better water pressure and more hot water? I (again, very politely, and without raising my voice) asked if he realized that it's ridiculous to have the hot water out for that long in a residential building, and probably worth a call to 311 to report a violation, and he copped an attitude. It's so much fun dealing with the new front desk staff; they haven't been here all that long, they're very young, and they can't seem to wipe the smug disdain off their faces while they're talking to tenants - they're just plain RUDE most of the time. I realize that they don't have to give a damn, and that they simply don't, but someone early on forgot to teach them the basic manners the rest of us were taught as a matter of course. The older staff, who have been here for quite a while have a totally different attitude. It's called respect.

Interestingly enough, when I got back, not only was the hot water back on, but another tenant told me that they'd actually found a practical use for that computer they've got in their plexiglass cage - a sign had been put up explaining the progress with the repair. Which, by the way, could have been done HOURS EARLIER that day, saving a lot of hassle for tenants who already have lowered expectations about the building's maintenance, because if it's not one thing, it's another - usually two broken elevators at a time for over a week.

Saturday, June 7, 2014

Business as usual...

So. We've had no hot water in the building for hours, and the front desk says that someone is working on the boiler right now. Meanwhile, when I was in the lobby a few minutes ago, two of our maintenance staff members were overheard asking each other which one of them was supposed to be working on the boiler. Do you think it's time to phone 311 and let them know that we don't have hot water?


Friday, June 6, 2014

Invitation: You're Invited to a Discussion on Affordable Housing @ Tue Jun 24, 2014 8am - 11am (Kenmore Hall Tenants Association)

You're Invited to a Discussion on Affordable Housing

The Care for the Homeless Policy Committee is sponsoring a presentation and discussion on New York City's new Affordable Housing Plan and Homelessness in New York City. The free program led by Policy Committee Chair Barbara Knecht, Policy Director Jeff Foreman and Care for the Homeless client leaders is open to the public but requires reservation by advance RSVP.

The program will be held at 8:15 a.m. on Tuesday, June 24th, at the CFH Conference room on the 5th floor at 30 E. 33rd Street in Manhattan, and will be repeated at the same location and time on Thursday, June 26. Advance reservations (subject to space limitations) are available by contacting policy@cfhnyc.org.

Download the printable version of this month's Policy Matters newsletter here.
When
Tue Jun 24, 2014 8am – 11am Eastern Time
Where
CFH Conference room on the 5th floor at 30 E. 33rd Street in Manhattan (map)
Calendar
Kenmore Hall Tenants Association
Who
Emily Brown - creator
emilyholiday.khta@blogger.com
Kenmore Hall Tenants Association

Going?    - -     

Invitation from Google Calendar

You are receiving this courtesy email at the account emilyholiday.khta@blogger.com because you are an attendee of this event.

To stop receiving future notifications for this event, decline this event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at https://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification settings for your entire calendar.

You're Invited to a Discussion on Affordable Housing

The Care for the Homeless Policy Committee is sponsoring a presentation and discussion on New York City's new Affordable Housing Plan and Homelessness in New York City. The free program led by Policy Committee Chair Barbara Knecht, Policy Director Jeff Foreman and Care for the Homeless client leaders is open to the public but requires reservation by advance RSVP

The program will be held at 8:15 a.m. on Tuesday, June 24th, at the CFH Conference room on the 5th floor at 30 E. 33rd Street in Manhattan, and will be repeated at the same location and time on Thursday, June 26. Advance reservations (subject to space limitations) are available by contacting policy@cfhnyc.org.   
 Download the printable version of this month's Policy Matters newsletter here.